The Karachi Tax Bar Association (KTBA) has once again urged the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to fix a major problem in its online tax filing system, IRIS. The issue relates to taxpayers who want to revise their wealth statements, but the IRIS portal blocks them even when the law allows such revisions. This technical blockage is causing unnecessary trouble for thousands of taxpayers across Pakistan.

This article explains the problem in simple words, highlights what KTBA is demanding, why the IRIS block must be removed, and how fixing it will make the tax system smoother and more transparent.

Introduction: Why KTBA Raised This Issue

Every year, millions of Pakistanis file their tax returns and wealth statements through the FBR’s digital system called IRIS. However, many taxpayers face a common problem:
Even when the tax proceedings against them end without any amendments, they still cannot revise their wealth statements.

This has become a major complaint, especially among compliant taxpayers who want to correct errors, omissions, or update financial information—something allowed under Section 116(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001.

To solve this problem, the Karachi Tax Bar Association has written a detailed letter to the FBR Chairman, urging immediate changes in the IRIS system.

What Is the IRIS System and Why Does This Issue Matter?

The IRIS portal is the official online platform used to file:

Income tax returns
Wealth statements
Sales tax returns
Withholding statements

However, many users say the system often blocks taxpayers from submitting revised statements even when they legally have the right to do so.

Why the IRIS block matters

It prevents correction of genuine mistakes
It violates taxpayers’ legal rights
It causes delays in compliance
It creates fear of penalties
It discourages transparency

For taxpayers who simply want to correct information, such hurdles can be extremely stressful.

Read Also: Breaking News: DigiSkills Launches 2nd Batch of Free Online Courses 2025 – Apply Before 2 December

Legal Background: What Section 116(3) Says

KTBA’s main argument is based on Section 116(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which clearly states:

A taxpayer can revise a wealth statement to correct any omission or wrong statement before receiving a notice under Section 122(9).

This means:

✅ If no notice exists
or
✅ If a notice was issued but later withdrawn
or
✅ If proceedings ended without any amendment

then the taxpayer has full legal right to revise the wealth statement.

Despite this, the IRIS system still blocks revisions.

Why KTBA Says the IRIS Block Is Unfair

The Karachi Tax Bar Association argues that IRIS is not aligned with the law.

Problems highlighted by KTBA:

1. IRIS treats closed cases as active notices

Even when proceedings under Section 122 are closed, IRIS treats them as ongoing, preventing revision.

2. System ignores withdrawn notices

Even if FBR itself withdraws a notice, IRIS still blocks the taxpayer.

3. Wrong interpretation of the law

KTBA says IRIS is technically programmed in a way that violates Section 116(3).

4. Compliant taxpayers suffer the most

These are taxpayers who want to remain transparent but face unnecessary hurdles.

KTBA says such system design discourages voluntary compliance and increases frustration among filers.

What KTBA Has Requested from FBR

In its letter to the Chairman FBR, KTBA made clear demands:

1. Reconfigure the IRIS system

IRIS should allow revision of wealth statements when no valid Section 122(9) notice exists.

2. Treat withdrawn and closed cases as no-notice cases

If proceedings are closed or notices withdrawn, revision must be allowed.

3. Remove unnecessary system blockages

Technical blocks that have no legal basis should be eliminated.

4. Follow true intention of the law

The system must align with the law instead of creating artificial restrictions.

5. Improve taxpayer facilitation

A user-friendly IRIS increases tax compliance and reduces disputes.

Read Also: Breaking News: Punjab Launches CM Meal Program for School Children

Why Taxpayers Need Wealth Statement Revision Options

Wealth statements show details like:

Cash
Property
Vehicles
Assets
Liabilities
Business capital
Investments
Bank balances

People may need to revise these for many reasons:

Common reasons for revision:

Missed information
Incorrect entry
Updated asset value
Change in tax year records
Human error during submission
Correction of calculation errors

If taxpayers cannot fix mistakes, they may face:

Penalties
Audit issues
Wrong tax records
Unnecessary notices

This is why KTBA says revision rights must be restored immediately.

Impact on Taxpayers Across Pakistan

The IRIS blockage affects:

Salaried individuals
Small business owners
Freelancers
Companies
Property owners
Traders
Professionals

Many taxpayers shared their concerns with KTBA, saying:

The system is slow
Errors cannot be corrected
Revision options remain locked
Notices remain visible even when withdrawn

These issues increase fear instead of improving tax compliance.

How Fixing IRIS Will Help FBR and the Public

1. Higher tax compliance

People will be more willing to file and revise returns without fear.

2. Reduced workload for FBR staff

Fewer complaints, fewer emails, fewer manual interventions.

3. More accurate taxpayer data

Updated wealth statements improve record-keeping.

4. Increased trust in the tax system

Smooth filing encourages more people to join the tax net.

5. Fewer legal disputes

Most disputes arise due to system errors. Fixing these reduces litigation.

What Happens If FBR Does Not Fix IRIS?

If the system remains unchanged:

Taxpayers will continue facing unnecessary hardship
Revision requests will pile up
FBR may lose credibility
Voluntary compliance may decrease
More disputes and court cases will arise

KTBA warns that this will harm both taxpayers and FBR’s overall performance.

Broader Tax Reforms Needed in Pakistan

The IRIS issue is part of a bigger tax reform challenge. Pakistan needs:

Simplified tax filing
One-window digital systems
Clear revision options
Error-free online portals
Real-time support for taxpayers

KTBA believes fixing IRIS is the first step toward modernizing Pakistan’s tax administration.

Read Also: Breaking News: NADRA Launches Online Biometric Verification for Islamabad Vehicle Transfers

Conclusion About KTBA request to FBR:

Click to Get Latest News Update Instantly

The Karachi Tax Bar Association’s request to FBR is a crucial step in protecting taxpayer rights and improving Pakistan’s tax filing system. The current IRIS block on wealth statement revisions is not only frustrating for taxpayers but also inconsistent with the law under Section 116(3). By reconfiguring the system and aligning it with legal provisions, FBR can make tax compliance smoother, fairer, and more transparent.

Fixing this issue will benefit both taxpayers and the tax authority, leading to a more trusted and efficient tax environment in Pakistan.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Why is KTBA asking FBR to fix the IRIS system?

KTBA is asking FBR to fix the IRIS system because taxpayers cannot revise their wealth statements even when the law allows it. The system blocks revisions unnecessarily, causing difficulty for compliant taxpayers.

2. What problem do taxpayers face in the IRIS portal?

Many taxpayers cannot update or correct their wealth statements because IRIS shows a blockage, even if tax notices were withdrawn or closed. This makes it hard to correct genuine mistakes.

3. What does Section 116(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance say?

Section 116(3) clearly states that a taxpayer can revise a wealth statement at any time before receiving a notice under Section 122(9). If no notice exists, the system should allow revisions.

4. Can a wealth statement be revised if a notice under Section 122 is withdrawn?

Yes, according to KTBA, a taxpayer should be allowed to revise their wealth statement if a notice is withdrawn or proceedings end without an amendment. IRIS should not block such revisions.

5. Why does KTBA say the IRIS system is unfair?

KTBA says IRIS is unfair because the system blocks revisions even when legally allowed. It treats closed or withdrawn notices as active and creates unnecessary hurdles.